Friday, April 29, 2011

Feeding The World With Technology?

World hunger and poverty is infesting the globe at an extremely rapid and destructive rate. Though there are many programs put in place to attempt to assist these hunger stricken nations, many of them are not enough or in fact do the opposite. The technological innovations of the Monsanto Company in the farming industry are some attempts to control hunger and "feed the world".

Though the support behind their new innovations is valid and legitimate, this Monsanto innovation is not likely to completely feed the world. It is quite clear that hunger is not something that can be fixed with a simple one step cure. There are so many factors contributing to the growing hunger epidemic that a simple cure is simply impossible. Although the Monsanto company has a great proposal, it is very unlikely that their new products, seeds and advertisements will bring a complete solution to world hunger. It is actually more likely that this will do the opposite and bring down local farming support and practices resulting in an increase of the poverty levels. "Corporate control of food and globalization of agriculture are robbing millions of their livelihoods and their right to food" (Shiva, pg. 7). Large corporations like these intend to halt hunger but result in poverty and hunger for those countries to whom they sell their products. Instead of helping, it deeply hurts local farming and farmers, as well as dropping prices so low that third world countries can no longer compete to sell their export crops, quickly leading to market imperialism and the demise of such countries. 'Food First: 12 Myths About Hunger' the author makes a comment that I agree with claiming, "It is not our job to set things right for others. Our responsibility is to remove the obstacles in their path, obstacles often created by large corporations and U.S. government, World Bank and IMF policies" (pg. 3).

These technologies are likely to most benefit the large corporations for the most part, with some beneficial factors for farmers. The farmers can benefit from this because they will be the ones who are using the corn seed products, producing cash crops and are being informed on farming families affected by hardships. Along with keeping farmers informed and supplied, companies such as Monsanto teach farmers how to use these products for maximum output, what tools to use, and how to conserve. The Monsanto GMO corn seeds are a more efficient way of farming, easy to use, and produce more while conserving more. While these seed products and advertisement displays are directly used and impacting farmers and their families, the large farming corporations are the ones who get the maximum benefit from the new innovations. In the end, the corporations benefit the most and make all of the money, but at the same time are not responsible for the problems that may result.

The reading of the 12 Myths About Hunger presents the idea that most of the things people would typically deem as the cause or source of the hunger epidemic across the globe, actually are not. Ideas such as free trade, U.S. aid, overpopulation and nature are not to blame for the worlds hunger issue. In an attempt to control hunger, Monsanto takes steps that seem to be helping farmers, but are they really? In my opinion, the company operates with an innovative perspective and worldview. The Monsanto company wants to create new original ideas that will soon be responsible for feeding the world. I do not deny that they intend for their new products to be beneficial and helpful to the farming communities and families across the country, but while doing this, these new innovations can perhaps land more on the destructive side of things once everything is said and done. It is likely that these products will end up doing the antithesis of what they are originally intended to do. The result of innovations like these is countries relying solely on imports from other countries rather than supporting their local farming businesses.

It is extremely hard to tell or decide whether companies and innovations such as these will do a great deal of harm or help starving countries to flourish. These products create a very bitter-sweet deal for the worlds farmers. They are produced with feeding the world close in mind, but the intentions of the company is not what matters. What matters is the end result, and in many circumstances like this the end result is not good, beneficial or feeding the world. The end result is typically destruction, poverty and increase in hunger rates globally.

"Food if our most basic need, the very stuff of life." (Shiva, pg. 5)



-Allison Williams

No comments:

Post a Comment